Innovation in Asian Philanthropy Report Launched

By Dien Yuen

Innovation in Asian Philanthropy: Entrepreneurial Social Finance in Asia, a new study published by the Asia Centre for Social Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy at NUS Business School (Singapore), was launched on May 8th amongst a crowd of domestic and international audiences at the philanthropy seminar, Innovation or Imitation. Does It Matter?.Continue Reading

Chinese Philanthropy in the Age of Weibo

Navigating the new world of social media should be a top priority for Chinese charities, according to Dawn Wang, senior correspondant for China CurrentWang’s story, China’s Philanthropy in the Age of Weibo, takes  look at the different ways emerging forms of social media and online communications are affecting NGOs in China, including: Continue Reading

The Next Wave of Philanthropy in China

Dien Yuen looks at the recent trends in philanthropy in China. Dien’s article is the final post of Asian Philanthropy Forum’s “Exploring the Impact of Asian philanthropy” series.

As a researcher and observer of philanthropic trends, I have noticed several themes that I think will affect China’s philanthropic sector in the near future. Even though China’s philanthropic sector is still in its infant stage, global forces and internal changes will have a big influence in shaping how quickly the philanthropic landscape develops. Here are some of my observations for the next wave of philanthropy in China:Continue Reading

Lessons Learned on Philanthropic Impact Investing

SonoAbe-150x150Sono Aibe reflects on sustaining the impact of philanthropic investments, based from her years of experience as a grant-maker and a grant-seeker. Sono’s article is originaly published on March 4, 2013 as part of Asian Philanthropy Forum’s “Exploring the Impact of Asian philanthropy” series.

Having gone from being a grant-seeker to a private foundation grant-maker and then back again, the journey has taught me a few things. I write this piece as a global public health professional devoted to promoting community health in impoverished areas of Asia and Africa.Continue Reading

The Less Generous World We’re Living In: Global Charity Decreases

This week, the Charities Aid Foundation released its annual World Giving Index 2012, the most comprehensive report on global charity available. Unsurprisingly, the report shows that giving trends around the world have mirrored economic conditions and decreased as a result. In fact, the report shows that there has been a decrease in all charitable behavior from helping strangers to volunteering time to giving money or in-kind products.Continue Reading

Launch of Survey on Corporate Philanthropy

 

This week, the Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy (CECP) and The Conference Board released their annual Corporate Giving Standard (CGS) survey of over 200 Fortune 500 companies. On average, the corporations surveyed gave $21 million in 2011 and combined donated $19.9 billion in cash and product. Beyond the statistics, the survey attempts to identify ways corporate giving is growing and evolving. Among the findings were that 60 percent of corporations had increased their giving from 2009 levels.Continue Reading

Deep Impact: Donations for Disaster

This piece was originally published in “Investing in Asia,” a publication distributed in USA Today that traverses the landscape of modern Asia to explore systemic issues of poverty and innovative solutions emerging on the continent. You can read “Investing in Asia” here. 

By Gillian Yeoh
Senior Program Officer & Disaster Response Lead, Give2Asia

As a child growing up in Malaysia, my father always told me it was best to live on higher ground in case of flooding.Fortunately, my family was always able to afford living on a hill. However, there are billions across Asia who do not have the financial resources to protect themselves from disasters. Through my own experience responding to disasters at Give2Asia, it is clear that the most vulnerable communities are also the hardest hit by disaster.Continue Reading

Seeing is Believing: Dr. Rozelle Explains How Solid Data and Research Persuade for Effective Education Policies in Rural China

 

Oct. 11, 2012

By Charles R. Ostertag

Dr. Scott Rozelle posed a difficult question during his presentation at Give2Asia’s 10th Anniversary Forum: What caused wages to rise in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and South Korea such that these once-booming manufacturing centers relinquished their first-place manufacturing titles in the 1970s and 1980s to China? Indeed, the wage rate in South Korea, which was once fifty cents an hour, is now $13 hour. Compare this to the annual real hour unskilled wage in China of $2 an hour. Dr. Rozelle’s answer: Education. When a population has skills in math, language, science, and information technology, they earn a higher and internationally competitive wage. Subsequently, Dr. Rozelle’s message on the major solution to the wage and poverty gap in rural China was also clear: Education.

The numbers are telling. In China, the high school education gap between rural students and their city counterparts is such that 83% or children in city areas attend high school while only 40% of rural children do so. Studies in other countries like Mexico have shown that when large populations do not receive the skills they need to be employed at a high wage rate, they become unemployed. Generally, unemployment offers these populations three choices: (1) immigrate to a country where unskilled labor is paid more than in the home country; (2) join an informal economy to produce income; or (3) become involved in crime.

As Co-director of the Rural Education Action Project (REAP), Dr. Rozelle hopes that China can make the push to higher wages and a more even distribution of wealth. REAP works in two ways. First, it designs and implements new programs, interventions, and conducts evaluations. Second, REAP partners with NGOs, government agencies, and others (corporations, universities, foundations) who are trying to implement projects in China. The principle is simple—seeing is believing. Show the positive effect of education and health programs in China and experiment to find cost effective and scalable solutions.

Reliable data and research is an essential tool in REAP’s work. Dr. Rozelle explained that rural children suffer vulnerabilities in health and nutrition that children in the city do not. For example, REAP tested forty-thousand rural students and discovered that within that population 39% suffered from anemia. Anemia has the effect of lowering IQ between 10-20 points and brings about intense lethargy. REAP also tested twenty thousand rural school children for eyesight problems: 15% of the children were nearsighted and only 142 of that 15% possessed glasses. In other terms, for every 40 nearsighted children, only one of them had proper eyeglasses. Testing showed that nearsightedness without proper eyewear lowered all of a student’s grade by one full grade point, i.e., grades that should be As were Bs. REAP also tested 1,700 rural school children for intestinal worms and found 24-40% of the children, depending on their location in Guizhou or Sichuan, were infected and subsequently suffered health and nourishment problems. Not surprisingly, when children were given diets high in iron and vitamins for their anemia, glasses for nearsightedness, and tablets to cure intestinal worms, their performance in school greatly improved.

Dr. Rozelle explained the ideal for philanthropic giving in China: Demonstrate to the government something works on one thousand school children, and then harness the government’s resources to transform those proven results into State policies that impact one million school children. The keys to action are (1) rigorously and simply demonstrate impact and (2) commit to scaling-up via policy engagement. The proper flow is transforming practice, analysis, and results into policy, and then transforming policy into a lasting impact on children. In parting, Dr. Rozelle emphasized that this kind of impact can only be created by involving all appropriate stakeholders such as children and their parents, teachers and principals, to local and high-level government officials. Education of China’s rural population depends on it.

Digging Deeper in the Sandbox: Desh Deshpande’s Advice to Social Entrepreneurs

Oct. 9, 2012

By Charles R. Ostertag

“Innovation plus relevance equals impact,” was the primary theme spoken by Lunch Keynote Speaker Dr. Gururaj “Desh” Deshpande that echoed over the attendees of Give2Asia’s 10th Anniversary Forum on Tuesday, Oct. 2. With four centers for social innovation in operation—the Deshpande Center at MIT, the Merrimack Valley Center for Innovation & Entrepreneurship in Lowell, Massachusetts, the Deshpande Center for Social Entrepreneurship in Hubli, India, and the Pond-Deshpande Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in New Brunswick, Canada—Dr. Deshpande offered seasoned advice to participants at all these centers, or anyone else who wants to change the world.

The initial steps aren’t as easy as they seem: Start with something different. Fund it. Then scale it so that it actually impacts people. Dr. Deshpande noted that the nonprofit world operates with greater impact when for-profit techniques and dynamics are introduced. For example, in the nonprofit world, people in great need will take what is given to them and the project could thereafter be called a success; however, the question of whether the project has real, lasting, and beneficial impact is often unknown or unsought. When applying for-profit principles of transparency, scaling, fluid management, and efficiency, among others, Dr. Deshpande challenges charitable projects to perform like the most successful companies and products in today’s international markets—with the measure of success being the lasting impact on the targeted community.

Mindset is also crucial. Within the context of foreigners coming to India, Dr. Deshpande also cautioned that those social entrepreneurs who arrive on the ground with solutions already in mind often fail when their ideas are actually implemented in Indian communities. Instead, Dr. Deshpande advocated arriving in India with an open mind and detailed knowledge of a problem as the best mentality for success. Then, the solution only begins to take form upon collaboration with the people the project is meant to affect.

For example, at the Deshpande Center in India, participants there recognized that children in many Indian communities often come to school hungry. A kitchen was then developed to feed children. What started out feeding a small group of school children grew into 185,000 meals a day and then to 1.3 million meals a day. This program now receives funding from both the government and private partners and continues to evolve. For example, the program now implements green kitchens and uses detailed logistics such as the strategic geographic placement of kitchens and supply trucks to reach the greatest amount of school children.

Dr. Deshpande also offered beginners in the field of social entrepreneurship inspiration in the event they feel uncomfortable or uncertain taking on the role of a social entrepreneur. Dr. Deshpande noted that beginners newly exposed to a problem ask questions others normally would not ask. Also, beginners think about a problem in a new light that others usually would not. Aligning with the ethos of social entrepreneurship and innovation, Dr. Deshpande reassured those new to the field, or tried and true experts, that innovation and entrepreneurship make one feel empowered, not paralyzed.

Making the Gift of Love Count

Give2Asia’s Chief Philanthropy Officer, Dien Yuen, recently spoke on philanthropy in Singapore with The Graduate, the quarterly magazine of the National University of Singapore Society. Her comments were published as a part “Making the Gift of Love Count,” a story that details philanthropy trends and practices in Singapore and makes comparisons with other Asian and western nations.

From “Making the Gift of Love Count:”

While philanthropy has matured in the U.S. and Europe it is still in its developing stages across Asia and by extension in Singapore. A major impediment to progress is caused by the lack of infrastructure to support philanthropy.

“A majority of the countries do not have a very developed regulatory framework that allows organizations to register and operate effectively,” says Dien Yuen, Chief Philanthropy Officer of Give2Asia, US-based philanthropic advisory organizations. “Many organizations end up not registering or registering as for-profit entities. An example would be China where many groups register as a social enterprise and not many have the ability to fundraise and offer donors a charitable tax deduction for their gifts.”

Even when a system is in place like in Singapore, Ms Yuen says there are bottlenecks that impede the giving process in some countries. One is the need to apply to receive “favored-tax treatment as an NPO.” (Charity in Singapore is granted automatic tax deduction); the other is the need for a permit to fundraise, which is a requirement in Singapore.

Another challenge is the lack of transparency to ensure accountability to donors. “Many organizations are not required to publish reports on the impact of their work, disclose conflict of interest issues, or publicly provide the financial information,” says Ms Yuen. “Many donors are hesitant about giving to organizations because they do not know if the funds will be used properly.”

From further on in the story:

As the social langscape differs from country to country, there is no one-size-fits-all model of philanthropy in Asia. In this regard, Ms Yuen believes that unless changes are made, effective philanthropy cannot be achieved.

“Groups of officials and practitioners are visiting non-profit organizations in the U.S. to learn how they operate,” she says. “With these lessons learned, the non-profit organizations in Asia have the opportunity to come up with their own giving vehicle or model that is more effective for them.”

You can read the full story, “Making the Gift of Love Count,” on page 16 of The Graduate, by clicking here.